He argues that free choice is compatible with determinism, and that an omnipotent being could determine that free creatures never choose wrongly.
If random processes are ubiquitous, as some interpretations of contemporary physics suggest, there will be little an omnipotent being can do.
Consider the following argument that purports to show that there is no ' evil demon ', no individual who is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnimalevolent.
There is nothing analytically incoherent in claiming that there is no omnipotent, omniscient, perfectly free, etc., being.
In addition, the argument must establish that the architecture of the universe reflects the work of an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent designer.
After all, he is omniscient and omnipotent, and so if there is some possible way he could bring it about.
Or is this an ironic reference to the omnipotent urge to take possession of space?
In an age of the ever-powerful, omnipotent and omnipresent nation state, culture cannot be divorced from the wider political environment.
