Hart's argument does not require him to hold that law actually creates an obligation in any metaphysical or moral sense.
Hart's conceptual analysis as nonambitious ensures that no sting can sting his legal theory.
Hart, supra note 73, at 244 (emphasis added). 79.
Hart wanted full control over the financial negotiations.
Hart admits that he addresses "questions which may well be said to be about the meanings of words" (vi).
Hart's approach was by no means one sided.
Hart has considered finite-amplitude perturbations, and a discussion of limit cycles is included in his paper.
Hart found that the linear instabilities underwent a subcritical bifurcation from the background state.