The first way is if every person, even if everlasting, remains free for only a finite number of choices.
Consequently, some living beings exercise their capacities for reproduction; other living beings do not need to, since they are everlasting.
Given that view, we would be faced with the everlasting dilemma of whether the different meanings are relatable or not.
The emotional scenes which accompanied their preaching seem to have been inspired by the threat of everlasting punishment.
Furthermore, the latter has some semantic problems, as well, as its closest synonym is 'everlasting', which cannot be true for any soil seed bank.
As to producing the 'everlasting' garment, this is, they claim, becoming closer to reality.
We doubt if it is prudent to postulate everlasting increases in total factor productivity, let alone in per capita output.
An alternative to viewing any individual human sin as warranting everlasting punishment is to view some pattern of sinful behaviour as calling forth everlasting punishment.
