That policy weakened the position of the primary producer and was followed for no reason but dogma.
In other words, the extra expense will be largely passed back to the primary producer.
It is not fair to the primary producer.
I said that throughout the world in every country the primary producer is underpaid.
The primary producer is the essential man, the man who produces food.
Whether he produces cocoa, coffee, tin or any other commodity, the primary producer is always hit when things go wrong.
The primary producer is at the mercy of a savage and ruthless market.
Alternatively, does our competition law discriminate too much against the primary producer?
