So normal divine powers may or may not be taken to imply omnipotence and omniscience.
First, the acousmetre has the power of seeing all; second the power of omniscience; and third, the omnipotence to act on the situation.
So, there is a problem about reconciling divine omniscience with the power to do otherwise.
Perhaps there is some way of answering the above doubts about omniscience and omnipotence.
If we give up passibility, omniscience becomes problematical because it is unclear what knowledge means if it includes no experiential content.
However, it is possible to define the core concept of omniscience in logical rather than psychological terms.
Attempts to specify the exact nature and scope of divine attributes are notorious for being the grounds of significant disagreement, and omniscience is no exception.
Now omniscience and benevolence are preserved at the price of sacrificing once again our considered judgements about what is possible and necessary.
