It is a highly allusive style and it may be asked why we should not think of it as "allusive"; why bring in metonymy?
For suppose we were to compute metonymy solely within pragmatics.
Furthermore, there is some evidence which suggests that logical metonymy is partially conventionalised and triggered by the lexical item, rather than knowledge of the context.
The linguistic performance of seduction does not replace the physical one on stage, then, either through a weak metonymy or a strong metaphor.
This is certainly true, but notice that the claim of metonymy per se does not address the mapping problem.
The distinction is often made between a metaphor and a metonymy, where the latter is 'the result' of the former.
Thanks to dynamic elements of the lexicon like metonymy and metaphor, many senses of polysemous words have some kind of relationship.
An example is crayon, which is known as "pencil" but which can also have the meaning "drawing" (instrument-to-result metonymy).
