0 the special rights that diplomats have while working in a country that is not their own, such as freedom from legal action: --
I sometimes have a slight suspicion that some of these people might be wrongly classified with the purpose of obtaining that diplomatic immunity.
It is for that reason that in civilised nations it is thought very necessary and valuable to have this diplomatic immunity.
Before the war there were 1,082 persons attached to the foreign diplomatic missions included in the list of persons entitled to diplomatic immunity.
It is true that our people are given diplomatic immunity when they go abroad.
Then there is the problem of civil cases and debt, because those holding diplomatic immunity cannot be sued in the courts for their debts.
It is a question about the diplomatic immunity of officers.
I should have thought that, from that point of view, diplomatic immunity was absolutely unnecessary for any of these people.
There is certainly no reason why one should have diplomatic immunity and the next one should be excluded.
