It is a very natural desire to demand an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and two lives for a life.
We are more inclined to pursue the policy of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
With his suggestion we should see a situation in which there would be an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
That is surely the concept of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth with a vengeance.
Retribution is a primitive instinct stretching back to lextalionis—an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
It is the emotional argument of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
The solution for transcending the demands of 'an eye for an eye' is neither moral, nor military, but political.
In the new culture of partnership, we recognise that the old adage of an eye for an eye leaves everybody blind.
