Príklady defendant

• The jury concluded from the evidence that the defendant was innocent.

• The defendant is accused of a range of crimes, from theft to murder.

• The judge directed the defendant to remain silent.

• The defendant sat impassively in the dock while evidence was given against him.

• A jury should not interpret the silence of a defendant as a sign of guilt.

• Defendant, what have you to say in your defense? 

• I suppose that it is for the jury to determine whether the defendant is guilty of a crime or not. 

• If the case has attracted much attention, the juror knows the prevailing ideas as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant. 

• Q. Were you present when defendant first offered his land for sale to the plaintiff? 

• You had quarreled with the defendant, with whom you had formerly been on friendly terms. 

• My claim is that judicial imposition of legal sanction at least expresses official disapproval of the defendant's conduct.

• There the defendant unquestionably chose to interfere in the victim's exclusive domain of choice, and so there is no doubt about his liability to punishment.

• After all, a juror at the outset has no basis for either affirming or denying the innocencem of the defendant.

• If they adopted the conclusion-centered approach, they would find for the defendant; if they took the premise-centered approach, then they would find against.

• But this is not guaranteed to happen just because the defendant was morally justified in the course on which he embarked.

• Since each premise commands majority support, the defendant would be found liable under this procedure.

• The case was settled recently as to all defendants just prior to the scheduled trial date.

• The defendant healthcare professionals contended that the families greatly exaggerated both the severity of the patients' pain and the professional unresponsiveness to it.

• There, as we saw, the plaintiff's right to remedy in some sense derived from the right in whose violation the defendant's breach of duty consisted.

• Litigation was indeed very costly for both plaintiffs and defendants, and the above expenses were only the tip of the iceberg.

• The restitutionar y claim is made out if some of the plaintiff's loss corresponds to some of the defendant's gain.

• The important point is that the defendant's duty to the plaintiff persists after its breach.

• It is admitted that neither of our defendants has the same intention as that of the unconditional intender.

• Urging jurors to suppose that the defendant is innocentm is neither necessary nor desirable.

• Note, however, the sense in which the judge's decision is responsive to the par ticipation of the (losing) defendant as well.