This stronger idea is implausible, since a much larger benefit to a slightly-better-off, but still poorly-off, person (or group of persons) may better promote equality.
However, it is implausible to regard all rights as individualistically justified.
But this is highly implausible, given that consequences are supposed to identify all that matters to an agent.
A nice idea in the eighteenth century was implausible in the nineteenth, failing to produce coherent and compelling narratives.
In a comparison condition, the functions that were demonstrated were judged to be implausible in this way.
Maybe some readers find non-aggregation equally implausible as assigning absolute priority to the worse off.
Additionally, it seems implausible that one person's counterfactuals be significantly dependent on another person's counterfactuals.
We are left, then, with one critical comparison, between the subject relatives (plausible and implausible) and their object counterparts.
