Griffin echoed this point by suggesting that simple perceptual consciousness is a core function of nervous systems.
Griffin challenges this dogma, expressing misgivings about the supervenience thesis.
Griffin assumes that the zone must be narrow.
Griffin's discussion of these issues is clear and useful, engaging with several recent works.
Griffin thinks that such incomparability constitutes a threat to practical rationality, and he clearly does not think that parity constitutes a similar problem.
Griffin contributed lovely examples of the perceptual uncertainties that animals face.
Griffin then sketches a new argument in favour of a narrow intermediate zone, beginning with a single value such as enjoyment.
Griffin admits that he has provided no argument to show that the zone must be narrow.
