This, we propose, can provide an explanatory framework for a range of social phenomena identified by sociologists but heretofore neglected by psychologists and cognitive neuroscientists.
Several neuroscientists continue the struggle to connect such theories more closely to genuine physiology.
Our claim, rather, is that many neuroscientists seem to be looking in the wrong direction for an account of the brain-basis of consciousness.
Such research will undoubtedly benefit from the explicit collaboration of linguists and cognitive neuroscientists with a view toward the development of dynamic neurocomputational models.
It has proven valuable to both neuroscientists and laymen in understanding the emotional underpinnings of rational cognition.
Although the cortex has received the most attention by cognitive neuroscientists, the subcortical generation of complex behavior is an often overlooked constraint on cortical representation.
This dearth of references reflects the attitude that pathologists and neuroscientists do not regard catatonia as a disease.
Emotion has always been a frightening topic for neuroscientists.
