0 the idea that a person, country or political system can be allowed to be different from, and perhaps better than, others:
His recognition of the contingent quality of that identity and his forays against exceptionalism are refreshing.
It is time to look critically at the attitude of exceptionalism that has clouded regulation of human subject research from its inception.
In the 1960s and 1970s, a new generation of scholars set out to demolish the myth of exceptionalism.
What is exceptional about the biomedical research industry is the degree to which its cries for exceptionalism were heeded and given weight.
It rejects the system-perfectionism from economics and case exceptionalism from sociology.
The contradictory legacies of this exceptionalism introduces well the papers focusing on more specific dimensions.
Most pressing, from the point of view of the urban biographer, is the question ^ of exceptionalism.
American exceptionalism may have worn out its welcome, but it may be time to reconsider the value of synthesis.
