0 the part of philosophy that studies moral duty
In such cases, the real bearer of the deontology is the participant in the economic transactions and the player in the game.
It seems inconsistent with if not deontology itself, at least the philosophical and moral motivations underlying deontology.
This section provides footing for the other sections by requiring training in both deontology and virtue.
Thus, even when deontology is silent, there may be actions that we (aretaically) should and should not do.
I begin by looking more closely at deontology in general and the duty not to harm in particular.
Yet deontology need not adopt a proportionality r ule to withstand this reductio.
In general, one can say this: human societies require a deontology, and the only way they can have this is by having language.
To say this, however, is to give up deontology for a version of rights consequentialism.