There is little point in being all things to all people at all times.
They try to be all things to all people.
However, no doubt the members of that party want to be all things to all people.
It is in danger of becoming all things to all people.
But do not try to be all things to all people.
They are setting themselves up as all things to all people, competing with the hardware and chemist shops in the small villages.
It simply tries to be all things to all people.
Can he explain that contradiction, or is he just a politician running scared of the electorate and trying to be all things to all people?
