0 used to describe company shares that do not allow their owners the right to vote at shareholder meetings: --
1 used to describe a member of a company's board of directors who does not have the right to vote: --
The amendments would enable non-voting members to know where they stand.
Very small amounts of voting shares can control very large amounts of non-voting shares.
I thought that he was trying to get rid of non-voting and restricted voting shares as a principle.
It is certainly one of the most generous and there is no question of non-voting shares or anything of that kind.
The amendment deals with the question of voting and non-voting shares.
It has not stopped us saying that the practice of having non-voting shares is rather regrettable.
Do we not talk about the same thing when we discuss voting and non-voting shares and rights in public companies?
The first is that the idea of voting as a trust seems to make non-voting the norm, or baseline, against which political rights and duties are to be judged.
