This is not petty criticism of typos or spelling errors, but reference to a certain lack of precision throughout the volume.
The print volume is exceptionally poorly produced, with typos, omissions, repetitions, verbless sentences and redundant apostrophes.
There were several typos and sections that were rather clumsily expressed.
Some contributions are plagued by typos and are poorly organized, while others are beautifully written and have the potential of becoming classic readings.
The problem is that our friends have only one flashlight with one battery that lasts for only 60 minutes (this is not a typo: sixty).
The volume would have benefited from closer proofreading to eliminate a number of stylistic infelicities, omitted words, typos, etc. which occur in some chapters.
Substitutions seem to top the list in spelling errors whereas omissions and insertions are more common in typos.
There are many typos, probable misspellings, hyphens in words where none belong, repeated lines of text, and missing words.
