The person making the promise to pay is also known as the promisor.
In his opinion the promise involved the promisor in two possible actions for breach of contract.
In this case the promisor made it clear that she did not intend to be legally bound.
Promises that are only to be carried out at the promisor's discretion cannot create a binding contract.
Detriment is measured at the time when the promisor proposes to withdraw his promise, not at the time when the promise is made.
However, promissory estoppel may permanently extinguish the rights of the promisor to claim lump sum after part-payment.
If it is done at the instance of a third party or without the desire of the promisor, it will not be good considsration.
For what items of damage should the court hold the defaulting promisor?
