This project is broader and more demanding than that of deliberative democracy.
Deliberative supranationalism seeks to overcome this democratic deficit by institutional procedures and cross-jurisdictional networks that encourage social learning.
It affects the willingness to discuss by shaping one's anticipation of achieving deliberative uptake.
Whatever the explanation, this finding provides fuel for the critics of deliberative democracy.
Our experimentation reveals at least that a deliberative model is not sufficient to account for what is at stake in public discussions.
How widely might they be generalized across the deliberative system?
On the other hand, they apparently do not want jurors to bring to their deliberative process the epistemic savvy that the judges themselves have.
Deliberative democracy is a normative theory based on ideals about how political interaction should proceed.
