In the initial stages a degree of nationalistic euphoria disguised a series of political tensions.
Conversely, the lesser globalized countries tend to foster a stronger nationalistic ideology within the public.
A social archaeology, therefore, which works against hegemony and domination should have no problem in opposing nationalistic narratives.
Many communities are revising their earlier nationalistic policy in the face of globalization.
The theory is, of course, both fiercely nationalistic and seemingly naive philosophically.
Colonialism is part of an imperialist impulse, not a nationalistic one.
Nationalistic opposition may be an obstacle, but it does not constitute a counter-argument in logical terms.
Is linguistic imperialism the non-military manifestation of over-inflated nationalistic pride?
