One need look no further than clause 1, which removes references to defrauding and deceit and uses the word "prejudice".
It is not just "defraud", and therefore it is not just whatever limited ambit that is meant to cover under the existing law.
In one of them five men were fined a total of £1,050 for conspiring to defraud by means of a mock auction.
It is not right to say that organised criminal landlord fraud is exactly the same as an individual claimant defrauding the system.
They also have stronger powers to tackle employers who collude with their staff to defraud the benefit system.
Is it not the truth that those figures were entirely bogus and an effort to defraud the electorate in the run-up to the election?
After that deception was uncovered, it transpired that he had defrauded another authority for whom he had previously worked of a further £48,000.
Is there ground for criminal proceedings, for obtaining money by false pretences with intent to defraud, for fraudulent conversion or publishing a fraudulent prospectus?
