Yet that rhetoric could no longer be deployed so unproblematically, or if it were it could be targeted by skeptics and opponents.
A numbers skeptic who made binary comparisons of alternatives could prefer (ii) to (iii), and (iii) to (iv), without giving weight to benefit size.
But why should the size of the benefit, from the same low baseline, matter to the numbers skeptic?
A skeptic might question why any moral weight should be given to the decisions and preferences of people who have died.
This provides welcome sharper focus on numerous points, and tempers more radical views of grammaticalization, though it probably will not convince skeptics.
We also did not believe our descriptions of mice freely climbing about the underside of water filled cages, would pacify the skeptics either.
In ranking (i) > (ii) > (iii) > (iv), the numbers skeptic rejects inequality that results from distributing the benefit in multiple increments.
On the other were the skeptics who sometimes openly disparaged science and at other times more cautiously expressed reservations about the scientific enterprise.
中文繁体
持懷疑態度的人…
More中文简体
持怀疑态度的人…
MoreEspañol
ortografía americana de “sceptic”: escéptico, -a, escéptico/ca [masculine-feminine…
MorePortuguês
ortografia americana de “sceptic”…
More日本語
“sceptic” の米国式つづり方…
MoreTürk dili
kuşkucu/şüpheci kimse…
MoreFrançais
sceptique [masculine-feminine]…
MoreCatalan
ortografia americana de “sceptic”: escèptic…
More