Presumably this predisposes to sudden death, but the association of sudden death and junctional rhythms is arguable.
Similarly, although psychophysical supervenience is an arguable view, it would be manifestly implausible to hold that the physical supervenes on the psychological.
Again, it is arguable that this classification is unsatisfactory.
Still, it is arguable that knowledge is bounded.
Moreover, it is arguable that communal rhetoric of inclusion succeeded only in making the institutions and attitudes it served more exclusive.
However, it is arguable whether the acquisition of these features are rule-based or lexically motivated.
However, this is arguable, as if semelfactives have no natural final endpoint, how can they produce iterative readings ?
Is it arguable that the finality of positive law is caused by the finality of "law as determined by practical reasonableness"?
