It is clear that some quite abstract robot representations have usefully tested some quite specific biological hypotheses.
Distinguishing between these two alternative hypotheses has important implications for the behaviour of political parties.
The findings reveal that the theoretical model has been supported to a substantial extent, although not all hypotheses were confirmed by the data.
As the structural dimension of solidarity had not strengthened, it was not surprising that the third hypotheses also had to be rejected.
All other hypotheses are also supported, and suggestions regarding the necessary future direction of environmental policy are made.
Careful observation and description of tropical forest change provides the material from which specific hypotheses must be formulated and examined.
This study's results challenge further many of the broad hypotheses that theorists of imperialism and dependency have attempted to apply to core-periphery relations.
The ability to test hypotheses about cognitive evolution's context is constrained by the archaeologist's ability to precisely reconstruct the specific benefits of a behaviour.
