Allowing for multiple-race responses requires new thinking about the very purposes of racial classifications in the first place.
On the other hand, when an institution fails to make correct or appropriate classifications, the very legitimacy of the institution is at stake.
Such classifications of knowledge came into existence with a view to how they would fit with bureaucracies.
We find here the introduction of artificial intelligence, and the attempt to create meaningful classifications of sound which would aid the principles of synthesis.
We can see that all tables show evidence of confusion among the classifications.
As applied here, the observed variables are the classifications assigned by the judges.
To lend empirical support for the viability of the classifications, we assessed correlations of the classifications with word classes.
Associations with the four group classifications were examined by cross tabulation and tested for significance by chi-square.
