Maybe so, but what is intuitively (though not uncontroversially) relevant is the distinction between a piece of benevolent behavior and a piece of malevolent behavior.
Innocent people's body-of-the-shades, in turn, could be harmed or captured by malevolent individuals.
It is not intuitively obvious that the distinction between a distinction involving malevolent behavior and a distinction involving benevolent behavior is morally relevant.
The world, as he saw it, was full of chisellers and con-men, hypocrites and grifters who were either ludicrous or malevolent or both.
For all of this, we have to hope that the architect is not malevolent !
It has been proposed that delusions of persecution are caused by the tendency to overattribute malevolent intentions to other people's actions.
They generally have malevolent and predatory deities as well as more benevolent and protective ones.
It might be objected that the difference between malevolent and benevolent motivation is intuitively more morally relevant than the distinction between one location and another.
