Romanek then claimed he has medical conditions that prevent a lie detector test from working on him.
As fact-finders, juries are expected to fulfill the role of lie detector.
Through this he developed an early version of the lie detector.
Other times, an individual will maintain their innocence despite the test results and ask to re-take the lie detector test.
He convinced her to take a lie detector test, which she passed, and it was enough to get her out on bail.
She claims to have stated this in several lie detector, brain mapping and narco-analysis tests that she cleared.
A perfectly innocent person can have proper hesitation or perplexities if he is being examined by the lie detector.
Secondly, will there be an appeal procedure for those who fail the lie detector test?
