In addition, it is possible that if jurors feel their pay inadequate, they may be less willing to carry out their duties conscientiously.
The principal question is not whether the jurors, individually and collectively, are convinced by the prosecution.
It is no accident that almost all the proposed definitions focus on the subjective state of the juror.
Yet the analogy on offer invites jurors to convict on the same precarious beliefs that typically guide their practical actions.
On the other hand, they apparently do not want jurors to bring to their deliberative process the epistemic savvy that the judges themselves have.
They had also to get used to speaking through a table microphone and communicating with the remote jurors through the video-conferencing system.
To put it explicitly, experts do not brainwash jurors the way that machines do.
Then we have wanted a way to warn jurors that they must not let exaggerated, hyperbolic doubts stand in the way of conviction.
