Příklady faithfulness

• Conversely, this contrast is neutralised if these faithfulness constraints are dominated.

• The prosodic shape of the base itself may vary, in the event that input-output faithfulness dominates markedness.

• Formally, the role of distinctness, and perceptual factors more generally, is encoded in both faithfulness and markedness constraints.

• To the extent, then, that certain segments must resist assimilation, those outputs that are shadowspecified represent optimal outputs with respect to both alignment and faithfulness.

• Therefore, it is not wholly unexpected that faithfulness might be extended to inter-candidate relations.

• The positional faithfulness approach accounts for accented dominant affixes by boosting the faithfulness properties of certain affixes.

• This view derails the sympathy-theoretic analysis, since the crucial count of faithfulness violations becomes impossible.

• Candidates (b) and (c) each incur one violation of an undominated constraint, with the choice being passed down to the lower ranked faithfulness constraints.

• There are distinct, separately ranked sympathetic faithfulness constraints on these two correspondence relations.

• It is when faithfulness constraints must be violated that the lower ranked constraint becomes visible.

• The idea is that markedness or faithfulness constraints referring to a feature class are gradient over the members of that class.

• Yawelmani, then, challenges this prediction of sympathy theory : processes that produce identical faithfulness violations should act together in rendering a third process opaque.

• These are the constraints that mandate surface faithfulness between the segments resulting from decomposition.

• Constraints militate against structural configurations (markedness constraints) or non-identical mappings (faithfulness constraints).