Let us start with the nos.
Four reports (nos. 4,9,10,14) recommended that use of technologies be strictly limited.
In addition to these three vocal sketches, he adds parts derived even more freely from nos. 11 and 11a.
The outbreaks (nos. 2, 3) at a holiday hamlet were only one month apart and may have been a recurrence of the same unknown pathogen.
Patient nos. 2 and 3 both had clinical candidiasis and received fluconazole and mycostatin treatment until the infection was cleared.
In particular, site nos. 10, 11 and 12 were the most polluted.
In two animals (nos. 16 and 17), antibodies were detected at time 0 (preinoculation).
In a further two outbreaks (nos. 20 and 23) it was unclear if the affected people were permanent residents or not.
