I say signature; because its position upon the vellum suggested this idea.
The cost is the raw cost of purchasing paper compared with the cost of purchasing vellum.
Other people are not suggesting that there are printing problems with vellum.
Why is that technology an objection to the continued use of vellum?
A few technical criticisms were thrown at vellum.
When the tax first came to this country in 1694, it was levied on the materials of business of the day—vellum, parchment and paper.
One of the arguments compared vellum with archival paper.
If that can be done, there will be no problem in continuing to use vellum.
