Would the owner of a tax-free toll bridge be committing any infringement of the law if he did not give a receipt for money paid?
Swinford toll bridge has been a headache to myself and to my predecessor for a very long time.
Again, it was a toll bridge, but the toll was not for a highway, but for a bridge.
A toll bridge is a toll bridge, and a railway bridge is one that does not charge a toll.
Finally, it is a toll bridge and this in this year of grace 1950 is an anachronism.
This is a toll bridge situated on two important trunk routes and as such constitutes a serious obstruction to traffic.
The purpose is to take the toll bridge, but not to take the remaining property.
Is it not the case for almost every toll bridge that the amount collected does not pay the interest?
