It's about ideas, and it has been amazingly successful - purely in terms of art, not foot-fall.
First, one can hypothesise that terms of art, jargon, specifically legal concepts and other specialised legal language only form a very small part of 'law talk' in most legal orders.
It contains, and must contain, many terms of art.
Phrases like "sovereignty", "executive and consultative status"and"constitutional" are terms of art.
These figures are not terms of art, of course.
I know it is difficult in these matters not to use terms of art.
This is a very sizeable sum of money in terms of art.
These words have a perfectly plain meaning and are not in any sense terms of art.
