I accept that the moorhen is common and.
I could mention many other birds more harmful than the coot or the moorhen.
That applies already if the contention is that in a particular area it is necessary to get rid of moorhens.
Very often the moorhen will drive other waterfowl away completely.
I do not know whether the coot causes so much damage as the moorhen.
I was influenced by the fact that the moorhen nuisance was a common nuisance.
Should not the coot and the moorhen go together?
The poor old moorhen is not really a quarry species.
