Thus, cadaveric directed donations should be permissible provided that the recipient and donor are emotionally related.
To recapitulate, none of the aforementioned non sequitur claims undermines my case for the confiscation of cadaveric organs.
Assuring adequate supply of cadaveric organs may constitute such an interest.
The need for cadaveric organs calls for stout-hearted and culturally appropriate information sharing, media coverage, visible public debates, and other forms of farreaching education.
We fail to see why routine recovery of cadaveric organs should generate such concerns.
Spurred by a severe shortage of cadaveric organs, there has been a marked growth in living organ donation over the past several years.
Thirty-one percent of the respondents said they would likely accept a policy of cadaveric organ conscription; 19% definitely would and 12% probably would.
I have considered two reasons why the public would not be willing to accept cadaveric organ conscription and why it would not be ethically justifiable.
