Will the tribunal be entitled to examine the accounts of the assignor before coming to a decision?
I believe that, where the definition goes on to say that it also includes "assigns", that could include an assignor.
It would therefore be necessary to join this assignor in the action.
He could become an assignor, before the end of his lease, to another person.
As we see it, the assignor can only recover sums incurred in the carrying out of structural alterations to a dwelling-house.
They mean merely that no additional powers are being given to enable the assignor to charge something he might not otherwise be entitled to charge.
That is necessary because often assignors are impossible to trace, or are companies in liquidation.
Obviously, they will not become the assignors about whom one is speaking when talking of the exercise of this right of forfeiture.
